Linking Geographic Dispersion, Commitment, and Job Satisfaction: the Mediating Role of Quality Relationship

Abstract

• Alge, B. J., Wiethoff, C., & Klein, H. J. 2003. When does the medium matter? Knowledge building experiences and opportunities in decision-making teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91: 26-37.
• Allen, T. 1971. Communication networks in R & D Laboratories. R&D Management, 1: 14-21.
• Allen, T. 1977. Managing the flow of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. 1990. Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61: 20-52.
• Anderson, N. R., & Thomas, H. D. C. 1996. Work group socialization. In M. A. West (Eds.), Handbook of Work Group Psychology, Chichester: Wiley. 
• Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. 1989. Social Identity Theory and the Organization. Academy of Management Review, 14: 20-39.
• Baba, M. L., Gluesing, J., Ratner, H., & Wagner, K. H. 2004. The contexts of knowing: natural history of a globally distributed team. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25: 547-587.
• Baltes, B. B., Dickson, M. W., Sherman, M. P., Bauer, C. C., & LaGanke, J. S. 2002. Computer-Mediated Communication and Group Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87: 156-179.
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. 1986. The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1173-1182.
• Bishop, J. W., Scott, K. D., & Burroughs, S. M. 2000. Support, Commitment, and Employee Outcomes in a Team Environment. Journal of Management, 26: 1113-1132.
• Blau, P. M. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York, NY: John Wiley. 
• Bordia, P. 1997. Face-to-Face Versus Computer-Mediated Communication: A Synthesis of the Experimental Literature. Journal of Business Communication, 34: 99-118.
• Brayfield, A. H., & Rothe, H. F. 1951. An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35: 407-411.
• Butler, J. K. Jnr 1986. A global view of informal organization. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 51: 39–43.
• Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, G. D., & Klesh, J. R. 1983. Assessing the attitudes and perceptions of organizational members. In S. E. Seashore, E. E. Lawler, P. Mervis & C. Camman (Eds.), Assessing organizational change, New York, NY: Wiley.
• Carlson, J. R., & Zmud, R. W. 1999. Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 153-170.
• Chidambaram, L. 1996. Relational development in computer-supported groups. MIS Quarterly, 20: 143-165.
• Cole, M. S., Schaninger, W. S., & Stanley, G. H. 2002. The Workplace Social Exchange Network: A Multilevel, Conceptual Examination. Group & Organization Management, 27: 142-167.
• Cooper, C. D., & Kurland, N. B. 2002. Telecommuting, professional isolation, and employee development in public and private organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23: 511-532.
• Crossman, A., & Lee-Kelley, L. 2004. Trust, commitment and team working: the paradox of virtual organizations. Global Networks, 4: 375-390.
• Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. 1984. Information richness: a new approach to manager information processing and organizational design. In B. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, 191-233.
• Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. 1986. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32: 554-571.
• Daft, R. L., Lengel, R., & Trevino, L. 1987. Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 17: 355-366.
• DeSanctis, G., & Monge, P. 1998. Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3.
• Emery, F. E. 1959. Characteristics of Socio-Technical Systems. London, UK: Tavistock Institute.
• Ford, L. R., & Seers, A. 2006. Relational leadership and team climates: Pitting differentiation versus agreement. The Leadership Quarterly, 17: 258-270. 
• Gerstner, C., & Day, D. 1997. Meta-Analytic Review of Leader-Member Exchange Theory: Correlates and Construct Issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 827-844.
• Golden, T. D. 2006. The role of relationships in understanding telecommuter satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27: 319-340.
• Golden, T. D., & Veiga, J. F. 2005. The Impact of Extent of Telecommuting on Job Satisfaction: Resolving Inconsistent Findings. Journal of Management, 31: 301-318.
• Graen, G. B., & Cashman, J. 1975. A Role-Making Model of Leadership in Formal Organizations: A Developmental Approach. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership frontiers, Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
• Graen, G., Cashman, J. F., Ginsburg, S., & Schiemann, W. 1977. Effects of Linking Pin Quality on the Quality of Working Life of Lower Participants. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22: 491-504.
• Hallowell, E. M. 1999. The human moment at work. Harvard Business Review, 77: 58-60.
• Hambley, L. A., O’Neill, T. A., & Kline T. J. B. 2007. Virtual team leadership: The effects of leadership style and communication medium on team interaction styles and outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103: 1-20. 
• Handy, C. 1995. Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Business Review, 40–50.
• Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. 2005. Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15: 69-95.
• Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. 1959. The motivation to work. New York, NY: Wiley.
• Hightower, R., & Sayeed, L. 1996. Effects of communication mode and prediscussion information distribution characteristics on information exchange in groups. Information Systems Research, 7: 451–465.
• Hinds, P. J., & Bailey, D. E. 2003. Out of sight, out of synch: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization Science, 14: 615–632.
• Hinds, P. J., & Mortensen, M. 2005. Understanding Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams: The Moderating Effects of Shared Identity, Shared Context, and Spontaneous Communication. Organization Science, 16: 290–307.
• Hoegl, M., & Parboteeah, K. P. 2003. Goal setting and team performance in innovative projects: on the moderating role of teamwork quality. Small Group Research, 34: 3-19.
• Hoegl, M., & Proserpio, L. 2004. Team member proximity and teamwork in innovative projects. Research Policy, 33: 1153-1165.
• Hollingshead, A. B., & McGrath, J. E. 1995. Computer-assisted groups: a critical review of the empirical research. In R. A. Guzzo, E. Salas & colleagues (Eds.), Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Homans, G. C. 1950. The Human Group. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace. 
• Homans, G. C. 1961. Social Behaviour. Its Elementary Forms. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
• Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. 1999. Communication and Trust in Virtual Teams. Organization Science, 10: 791-815.
• Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. E. 1998. Is anybody out there?: antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14: 29-64.
• Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. 1999. Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict, and Performance in Workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 741-763.
• Kamdar, D., & Van Dyne, L. 2007. The Joint Effects of Personality and Workplace Social Exchange Relationships in Predicting Task Performance and Citizenship Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 1286-1298. 
• Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. 1978. The Social Psychology of Organizations (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
• Kerr, E. B., & Hiltz, S.R. 1982, Computer-Mediated Communication Systems: Status and Evaluation, New York, NY: Academic Press.
• Keup, L. 2000. A network of working relationship and its influence on individual job outcomes. Doctoral thesis, (mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca).
• Keup, L., Bnuiing, N. S., & Seers, A. 2004. Members, leaders and the team: Extending LMX to co-worker relationships. ASAC, 1-15.
• Kiesler, S., & Cummings, N. J. 2002. What Do We Know about Proximity and Distance in Work Groups? A Legacy of Research. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., McGuire, T. W. 1984. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39: 1123-1134.
• King, J. L., & Frost, R. 2002. Managing distance over time: The evolution of technologies of dis/ambiguation. In P. Hinds S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Gibson, C. B., & Tesluk, P. E. 2002. Five Challenges to Virtual Team Success: Lessons from Sabre, Inc. The Academy of Management Executive, 16: 67-79. 
• Knoll, K. E. 2000. Communication and Cohesiveness in Global Virtual Teams. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
• Kock, N. 2002. Managing with Web-based IT in mind. Communications of the ACM, 45: 102-106.
• Kraut, R., Egido, C., & Galegher, J. 1990. Patterns of Contact and Communication In Scientific Research Collaboration. In J. Galegher, R. Kraut, & C. Egido, Intellectual teamwork: The social and technological bases of cooperative work, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., Brennan, S.E., & Siegel, J. 2001. Understanding Effects of Proximity on Collaboration: Implications for Technologies to Support Remote Collaborative Work. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Kristof, A. L., Brown, K. G., Sims, Jr. H. P., & Smith, K. A. 1995. The Virtual Team: A Case Study and Inductive Model. In M. M. Beyerlein, D. A. Johnson & S. T. Beyerlein, Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams: Knowledge Work in Teams, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
• Kurland, N. B., & Cooper, C. D. 2002. Manager control and employee isolation in telecommuting environments. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 13: 107-126.
• Kuo, F., & Yu, C. 2009. An Exploratory Study of Trust Dynamics in Work-Oriented Virtual Teams. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14: 823-854.
• Latané, B. 1981. The Psychology of Social Impact. American Psychologist, 36: 343-356.
• Latané, B., Liu, J., Nowak, A., & Bonevento, M. 1995, Distance Matters: Physical Space and Social Impact. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21: 795-805.
• Liden, R. C., Sparrowe, R., & Wayne, S. J. 1997. Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 15: 47-119.
• Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. 2000. An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 407-416.
• Locke, E. A. 1969. What is job satisfaction?. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4: 309-336.
• Locke, E. A. 1976. The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago: Rand McNally.
• Lojeski, K. S., Reilly, R., & Dominick, P. 2006. The Role of Virtual Distance in Innovation and Success. Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, Maui.
• Love, M. S., & Forret, M. 2008. Exchange Relationships at Work. An Examination of the Relationship Between Team-Member Exchange and Supervisor Reports of Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14: 342-352.
• Mason, C. M., & Griffin, M. A. 2002. Group task satisfaction: Applying the construct of job satisfaction to groups. Small Group Research, 33: 271-312.
• Massey, P., Montoya-Weiss, M., Hung, C., & Ramesh, V. 2001. Cultural Perceptions of Task-Technology Fit. Communications of the AC, 42: 83-84.
• Maznevski, M. L., & Chudoba, K. M. 2000. Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness. Organization Science, 11: 473-492.
• Meyer, J. P., Becker, T. E, & Van Dick, R. 2006. Social identities and commitments at work: Toward an integrative model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27: 665-683.
• Monge, P. R., Kirste, K. K. 1980. Measuring Proximity in Human Organizations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43: 110-115.
• Monge, P. R., Rothman, L. W., Eisenberg, E. M., Miller, K. I., & Kirste, K. K. 1985. The dynamics of organizational proximity. Management Science, 31: 1129-1141.
• Montoya-Weiss, M., Massey, P., & Song, M. 2001. Getting it together: Temporal Coordination and Conflict Management in Global Virtual Teams. Academy of Management, 44: 1251-1262.
• Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter L. M. 1979. The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14: 224-247.
• Ocker, R. J., Hiltz, S. R., Turoff, M., & Fjermestad, J. 1995. The effects of distributed group support and process structuring on software requirements development teams: Results on creativity and quality. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12: 127-153.
• Orlikowski, W. 1992. The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations. Organization Science, 3: 398-427.
• O’Leary, M. B., & Cummings, J. N. 2007. The Spatial, Temporal, and Configurational Characteristics of Geographic Dispersion in Teams. MIS Quarterly, 31: 433-452.
• Pauleen, D. J. 2003. An inductively derived model of leader-initiated relationship building with virtual team members. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20: 227-256.
• Powell, A., Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. 2004. Virtual Teams: A Review of Current Literature and Directions for Future Research. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 35: 3-36.
• Pearce, C. L., & Herbik, P. A. 2004. Citizenship Behavior at the Team Level of Analysis: The Effects of Team Leadership, Team Commitment, Perceived Team Support, and Team Size. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144: 293-310.
• Shirani, A. I., Tafti, M. H. A., & Affisco, J. F. 1999. Task and technology fit: a comparison of two technologies for synchronous and asynchronous group communication. Information & Management, 36: 139-150. 
• Seers, A. 1989. Team-member exchange quality: A new construct for role-making research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43: 118-135.
• Seers, A., & Graen, G. B. 1984. The dual attachment concept: a longitudinal investigation of the combination of task characteristics and leader-member exchange. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33: 283-306.
• Seers, A., Petty, M. M., & Cashman J. F. 1995. Team-Member Exchange Under Team and Traditional Management: A Naturally Occurring Quasi-Experiment. Group & Organization Management, 20: 18-38.
• Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B 1976. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
• Smith, J. Y., & Vanecek, M. T. 1990. Dispersed group decision making using non-simultaneous computer conferencing: A report of research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7: 71-92.
• Solomon, C. 2001. Managing Virtual Teams. Workforce, 80: 60-65.
• Straus, S. G. 1996. Getting a clue: The effects of communication media and information distribution on participation and performance in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research, 27: 115-142.
• Tajfel, H. 1978. The Achievement of Group Differentiation. In H. Tajfel (Eds.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations,. London, UK: Academic Press.
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. 1985. The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (2nd eds.),.Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
• Townsend, A., DeMarie, S., & Hendrickson, A. 1998. Virtual Teams: Technology and the Workplace of the Future. Academy of Management Executive, 2: 17-29.
• Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., & Inversin, L. 2004. Work Related and “Private” Social Interactions at Work. Social Indicators Research, 67: 145-182.
• Tung, L., & Turban, E. 1998. A Proposed Research Framework for Distributed Group Support Systems. Decision Support Systems, 23: 175-188.
• Walther, J. B. 2002. Time effects in computer-mediated groups: Past, present, and future. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed Work, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Warkentin, M. E., Beranek, P. M. 1999. Training to Improve Virtual Team Communication. Information Systems Journal, 9.
• Warkentin, M. E., Sayeed, L., & Hightower, R. 1997. Virtual Teams versus Face-to-Face Teams: An Exploratory Study of a Web-based Conference System. Decision Sciences, 28: 975-996. 
• Wiesenfeld, R. M., Raghuram, S., & Garud, R. 1999. Communication patterns as determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization. Organization Science, 10: 777-790.
• Williams, K., & O’Reilly, C. 1998. Demography and Diversity in Organizations: a Review of 40 Years of Research, Research in Organizational Behavior, 20: 77-140.
• Workman, M., Bommer, W., & Kahnweiler, W. 2003. The effects of cognitive style and media richness on commitment to telework and virtual teams. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63: 199-219.
• Yap, C. S., & Tng, H. 1990. Factors associated with attitudes towards telecommuting. Information & Management, 19: 227-23.
• Yeh, Y. M. C. 2005. An investigation of the impact of leader-member exchange, team-member exchange on staff attitudes and perceptions for accounting professionals. Dissertation, Nova Southeastern University, Florida.
• Zajonc, R. B. 1968. Attitudinal Effect of Mere Exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Monograph Supplement), 9: 2-17.